Yates blasts referee

Talk about anything to do with Cheltenham Town, CTFC 500 Club, League 1, ex players & Managers

Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin

Rick
Posts: 225
Joined: 11 Dec 2011, 21:06
paperboy wrote:
everyman wrote:
Nesty wrote:Yates is getting tetchy with the interviewers, sounds almost arrogant
He does have an awful habit of turning away from the camera as though he is looking for a way out of his discomfort at being questioned ?
Yes , he's definitely not a natural in front of the cameras.
He does the same when on the regional football show.
It's as if he's on the look out for someone chasing after him.
I'm sure i haven't seen him featured on Crimewatch.
A bit Shifty then ;) ;) :D
User avatar
Horteng
Posts: 3167
Joined: 25 Nov 2009, 22:57
Location: Heart of the Forest, Glos
Nesty wrote:Yates is getting tetchy with the interviewers, sounds almost arrogant
Yes as I mentioned last week...... What ever happens in matches Yatsie needs to stop acting like a spoilt brat..... As you say he is becoming arrogant in these interviews...... Is this part of the Pro Licence?
User avatar
Educated Bertie
Posts: 109
Joined: 24 Nov 2009, 00:18
Location: In & Out of all fine watering-holes.
Nesty wrote:Yates is getting tetchy with the interviewers, sounds almost arrogant
Mr Yates never looks the interviewers in the eye, giving himself the unwarranted impression of being utterly bored by the tediousness of the experience.
leohoenig
Posts: 2158
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 10:50
Contact:
There is always the possibility that it is a warranted impression
User avatar
ctfcshire
Posts: 206
Joined: 20 Nov 2010, 20:14
51/84 wrote: The second half had a spell of passing which ended with Sammy hitting the bar but other than that it was hoof ball
His booking was spot on ( a bit harsh as it was mistimed )but still technically correct
It was never a booking not in a million years.
The bloke that barged into Scott Brown when he was about to start a counter attack should have been booked.
There penalty was not a penalty.
Our penalty appeal was not a penalty - Gornell dived.
The ref seemed to let everything go yet gave the softest of decisions when awarding a penalty to Burton it hit Penn's hand but they were down by his side and he raise his hand after it hit his hand I can only assume that the referee thought it was vice versa.
Si Robin
Posts: 5431
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 10:29
If their penalty had been the other way around, I daresay there would be a number of people on here going mad that we were robbed of a penalty. It's one of those which are more often given than not these days.

I believe Gornell went down easily. There would have been no excuse from Burton if the pen was given.
User avatar
Shade
Posts: 17002
Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 13:02
Location: Cheltenhamshire
As Mark Halliwell said on his blog, what would be the point of Gornell diving? He was one-on-one with the keeper if he stayed on his feet.
User avatar
Hubert Parry
Posts: 2443
Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
Si Robin wrote:If their penalty had been the other way around, I daresay there would be a number of people on here going mad that we were robbed of a penalty. It's one of those which are more often given than not these days.

I believe Gornell went down easily. There would have been no excuse from Burton if the pen was given.
Exactly. I would have been the first standing up had Penn been a Burton player.
User avatar
Shade
Posts: 17002
Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 13:02
Location: Cheltenhamshire
Hubert Parry wrote: Exactly. I would have been the first standing up had Penn been a Burton player.
First and longest then.

Oh, I took that out of context...
Robin
Posts: 16016
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:19
Hubert Parry wrote:
Si Robin wrote:If their penalty had been the other way around, I daresay there would be a number of people on here going mad that we were robbed of a penalty. It's one of those which are more often given than not these days.

I believe Gornell went down easily. There would have been no excuse from Burton if the pen was given.
Exactly. I would have been the first standing up had Penn been a Burton player.
A Burton player did the exact same thing about ten minutes before when we had a corner however it was waved away as ball to hand.
mattyboi
Posts: 606
Joined: 05 Dec 2011, 22:39
Shade wrote:As Mark Halliwell said on his blog, what would be the point of Gornell diving? He was one-on-one with the keeper if he stayed on his feet.
Trouble is footballers are NOT very clever!
User avatar
Hubert Parry
Posts: 2443
Joined: 22 Jul 2011, 09:09
Robin wrote:
Hubert Parry wrote:
Si Robin wrote:If their penalty had been the other way around, I daresay there would be a number of people on here going mad that we were robbed of a penalty. It's one of those which are more often given than not these days.

I believe Gornell went down easily. There would have been no excuse from Burton if the pen was given.
Exactly. I would have been the first standing up had Penn been a Burton player.
A Burton player did the exact same thing about ten minutes before when we had a corner however it was waved away as ball to hand.
Then I would have stood up then had I been there and gestured like a man possessed.
User avatar
Shade
Posts: 17002
Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 13:02
Location: Cheltenhamshire
mattyboi wrote:
Shade wrote:As Mark Halliwell said on his blog, what would be the point of Gornell diving? He was one-on-one with the keeper if he stayed on his feet.
Trouble is footballers are NOT very clever!
If we're doing general sweeping stereotypes, nor are football fans.
Last edited by Shade on 05 Aug 2013, 22:23, edited 1 time in total.
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29824
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Hubert Parry wrote:
Then I would have stood up then had I been there and gestured like a man possessed.
Superbly articulated.
Post Reply