Sam Deering

Talk about anything to do with Cheltenham Town, CTFC 500 Club, League 1, ex players & Managers

Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin

Post Reply
mattyboi
Posts: 606
Joined: 05 Dec 2011, 22:39
Lets be honest, hes a good squad player to fill in here and there and use a sub through the season. But what has he contributed since being a regular in the starting line up. He runs around alot, but often with no end product. The trouble we have in Penn, Pack and Summerfield were class and now we have just 1 of those. Hopefully Noble will shine. But i just think Sammy isnt good enough to warrant a starting place on Saturday.
Top
Robin
Posts: 15990
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:19
I believe Deering will be dropped unless we go 4-3-3 with him and Gilly playing off Terry.
Top
51/84
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 Nov 2009, 10:20
sam is poor coming off the bench
Top
IYWT
Posts: 140
Joined: 12 Apr 2011, 17:39
We will not be anywhere near the top 7 with Deering in the team, especially on the wing
Top
RED ROB
Posts: 596
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 16:05
So play him in his rightful position, he's never ever been a winger. :roll: :roll: :roll:
Top
User avatar
Pie
Posts: 2898
Joined: 24 Aug 2011, 11:24
Location: In The Wymans (sipping a Panda Pop)
Ah so Deering is the new name on the lips f the boo boys.
Office me if in wrong but Deering was the best player during Pre-season? He was playing "in the hole" just behind the strikers, he linked the play well and set up a fair few goals.
But now he's being played out of position, it's being questioned as to if we actually need him.

People will argue "why did we being in Noble if Sam is so good", well Noble plays as a CM and not a ACM, and it also doesn't help that Deering is playing out of position.
It's like getting Steve Elliot to play as a striker!
Top
THECHOIRBOY
Posts: 900
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 10:15
Pie wrote:Ah so Deering is the new name on the lips f the boo boys.
Office me if in wrong but Deering was the best player during Pre-season? He was playing "in the hole" just behind the strikers, he linked the play well and set up a fair few goals.
But now he's being played out of position, it's being questioned as to if we actually need him.

People will argue "why did we being in Noble if Sam is so good", well Noble plays as a CM and not a ACM, and it also doesn't help that Deering is playing out of position.
It's like getting Steve Elliot to play as a striker!
But......is Deering good enough that we change the formation / make up of our team to build it around him?
Top
CTFC03
Posts: 1451
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 20:32
Deering needs to be dropped.
Top
User avatar
cliffy90
Posts: 861
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 10:31
CTFC03 wrote:Deering needs to be dropped.
I expect he will be.
Top
confused.com
Posts: 2666
Joined: 04 Oct 2012, 07:16
have to buck the trend, I thought Sam put in a decent shift on Tuesday. Not saying we should build a team around him, but he definitely does not deserve some of the rubbish being talked on here
Top
User avatar
rasta
Posts: 817
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 15:17
got pushed over twice in first 5mins on Tuesday, came alive when they went to 10 men, not a midfielder, needs to play in the hole, metaphorically speaking
Top
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29808
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Sounds like he did well at the Boleyn according to reports?
Top
51/84
Posts: 3576
Joined: 24 Nov 2009, 10:20
but his passing was poor. Change direction passes to Low but to where he was not where he was going.
To often the pass stopped the momentum rather than add to it
Top
RED ROB
Posts: 596
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 16:05
I make Sam No 5 on the scapegoat list now.
Over recent games hardly anyone has covered themselves in glory.
Top
baggy89
Posts: 567
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:55
51/84 wrote:but his passing was poor. Change direction passes to Low but to where he was not where he was going.
To often the pass stopped the momentum rather than add to it
This was an issue on Tuesday, but instead of dropping I'd suggest he needs a run of games.

The main issue with us, as pointed out to me, we have too many good players to fit a good formation.

Yates and his management team need to sort out how we are going to play. Stick to it. Coach it. And let others worry about it. We have the quality to play 3-4-3, 4-5-1, 3-5-2, 4-4-2

Sammy can be part of it.
Top
mattyboi
Posts: 606
Joined: 05 Dec 2011, 22:39
[quote="Pie"]Ah so Deering is the new name on the lips f the boo boys.

Well if Jason Taylor can come in for it, why cant Deering? Alot of people cant see what he contributes?
Top
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Posts: 29808
Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
baggy89 wrote:
51/84 wrote:but his passing was poor. Change direction passes to Low but to where he was not where he was going.
To often the pass stopped the momentum rather than add to it
This was an issue on Tuesday, but instead of dropping I'd suggest he needs a run of games.

The main issue with us, as pointed out to me, we have too many good players to fit a good formation.

Yates and his management team need to sort out how we are going to play. Stick to it. Coach it. And let others worry about it. We have the quality to play 3-4-3, 4-5-1, 3-5-2, 4-4-2

Sammy can be part of it.
A squad is there to be used. Pick the best players for a formation. If the next game a different formation is preferable, pick the best players for that.

Don't shoe-horn players in to a system they don't fit (Deering wing, Benson one up top last season, etc)
Top
Old Coventrian
Posts: 195
Joined: 22 Nov 2009, 22:05
baggy89 wrote:
51/84 wrote:
The main issue with us, as pointed out to me, we have too many good players to fit a good formation.
I've never heard such rubbish - too many good players to play a good formation? How do Chelsea. Man U, Arsenal, Real Madrid etc manage then? They've got lots more good players than us
Top
Post Reply