Anyone else notice that we are doing a lot more over night stays for away games now? So far we have done Scunny, Chesterfield, Accrington, Torquay and now Dagenham that I know of.
I am not saying it's wrong far from it but perhaps money is no longer as tight as it was in previous seasons.
Over night stays
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
Yes, we only shipped 2 at Scunny which is a rarity for that part of the country, and we won north of Birmingham at Accrington. We also apparently gave a good account of ourselves at Chesterfield, leaving Torquay as the only big disappointment (in my eyes).
Always looking on the bright side.
Always looking on the bright side.
- taxidave
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 09:56
- Location: Crewe station buffet, wish I'd stayed there!
I cannot understand how you can possibly consider losing 2 - 0 anywhere to be a good result, but it does at least explain your comment about always looking on the bright side, perhaps you should start being a little more realistic.Shade wrote:Yes, we only shipped 2 at Scunny which is a rarity for that part of the country, and we won north of Birmingham at Accrington. We also apparently gave a good account of ourselves at Chesterfield, leaving Torquay as the only big disappointment (in my eyes).
Always looking on the bright side.
- taxidave
- Posts: 3510
- Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 09:56
- Location: Crewe station buffet, wish I'd stayed there!
I thought that was the whole point of forums like this one, to encourage discussion and express different points of view .Ralph wrote:Dave, people are entitled to their own opinions even if it does appear different to yours. No point attacking the poster just because you disagree with his pov
I didn't say I considered it a good result. The question was has it improved results, and given that we'd conceded 4 the previous week and usually seem to come back from anywhere north of Brum with at least 3 against, it seemed to be, to me, an improved result.taxidave wrote:I cannot understand how you can possibly consider losing 2 - 0 anywhere to be a good result, but it does at least explain your comment about always looking on the bright side, perhaps you should start being a little more realistic.Shade wrote:Yes, we only shipped 2 at Scunny which is a rarity for that part of the country, and we won north of Birmingham at Accrington. We also apparently gave a good account of ourselves at Chesterfield, leaving Torquay as the only big disappointment (in my eyes).
Always looking on the bright side.
Who isn't being realistic anyway? I haven't strayed from any facts, just gave my opinion the same as you always do. And yes, my comment at the end was me pointing out I try to take the positives out of things, especially when everyone else doesn't. f#!$ me, right?!
Exactly! that was my point . To encourage discussion, there need to be differing pov's. Attacking the poster for having a different view to you is NOT encouraging discussion.taxidave wrote:I thought that was the whole point of forums like this one, to encourage discussion and express different points of view .Ralph wrote:Dave, people are entitled to their own opinions even if it does appear different to yours. No point attacking the poster just because you disagree with his pov
Attack the post not the poster TD even if you are a wum
-
- Posts: 29811
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Overnight stay did the job it seems.