Register    Login    Search    FAQ



CTFC.com Official Site Cheltenham Town FC 500 Club

Other Useful Links:     Leo's Blog    Robins Trust    CTFC Chatter    Football Ground Guide    This is Gloucestershire    News Now    CTFC History Site

Board index » THE NEST » CTFC CHAT ONLY




 Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 



Author Message
 Post subject: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 17:58 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 04:27
Posts: 18074
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Your manager and team did you proud today!

Looking forward to two Glos teams in L2 again next season, battling to see who finishes higher.


Top  Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
 Post subject: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:04 
Offline

Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 13:00
Posts: 694
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 0 time
And their goalie deserves praise for his time wasting


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:09 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 04:27
Posts: 18074
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
ctfc-fan wrote:
And their goalie deserves praise for his time wasting


Our fault for giving them something to hang on to.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:24 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 14:02
Posts: 9441
Location: Cheltenhamshire
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Refs fault for being a pleb. A common theme. Think you have to be a pleb to ref at this level but at least he added 6 mins on. I thought the loose rule was 6 seconds to hold on to the ball but every time he held it for 15 secs bare minimum, usually over 20. But this seems standard with the refs apparently scared to book players at WR for time wasting.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:25 
Offline

Joined: 26 Nov 2014, 00:39
Posts: 135
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Shade wrote:
Refs fault for being a pleb. A common theme. Think you have to be a pleb to ref at this level but at least he added 6 mins on. I thought the loose rule was 6 seconds to hold on to the ball but every time he held it for 15 secs bare minimum, usually over 20. But this seems standard with the refs apparently scared to book players at WR for time wasting.


He could of added another 90 minutes and we wouldn’t of scored


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:26 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 04:27
Posts: 18074
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 2 times
Shade wrote:
Refs fault for being a pleb. A common theme. Think you have to be a pleb to ref at this level but at least he added 6 mins on. I thought the loose rule was 6 seconds to hold on to the ball but every time he held it for 15 secs bare minimum, usually over 20. But this seems standard with the refs apparently scared to book players at WR for time wasting.


I repeat; had we not been so inept and given them something to hold on to this isn’t even an issue. Gary said in his interview this was another case of letting a side get in front and close the game down. Emphasis on ‘another’ I would add.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:36 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 14:02
Posts: 9441
Location: Cheltenhamshire
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
I couldn't give a s#!t. The refs are still plebs for letting it go week after week.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:40 
Offline

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 10:37
Posts: 4156
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 2 times
Shade wrote:
Refs fault for being a pleb.


Woah, woah, woah...I'm not having that. I thought that was one of the better refereeing performances I've seen at this level. In the first 5 mins, he could (and maybe should) have booked one from each team. He didn't, and seem to get more control as a result. He absolutely rightly booked Mo for being an embarrassment (I counted at least four acts of 'simulation' - with one genuine foul in the middle that, had he not been trying to con the ref beforehand, he may well have got.) I think the ref had a good game.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:43 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 27 Sep 2010, 14:02
Posts: 9441
Location: Cheltenhamshire
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
asl wrote:
Shade wrote:
Refs fault for being a pleb.


Woah, woah, woah...I'm not having that. I thought that was one of the better refereeing performances I've seen at this level. In the first 5 mins, he could (and maybe should) have booked one from each team. He didn't, and seem to get more control as a result. He absolutely rightly booked Mo for being an embarrassment (I counted at least four acts of 'simulation' - with one genuine foul in the middle that, had he not been trying to con the ref beforehand, he may well have got.) I think the ref had a good game.


That's got absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying. Is it so hard for you guys to understand I'm having a go at him for not dealing with the timewasting?


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:59 
Offline

Joined: 03 Feb 2015, 01:13
Posts: 326
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Agree with Shade, putting everything else aside he let them get away with blatant timewasting over and over again. If he books their keeper for it early on (as he should have) then the timewasting stops and we don't have to spend 45 minutes watching their keeper lying down, pretending to have cramp and holding the ball for thirty minutes at a time.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 19:19 
Offline

Joined: 03 Aug 2012, 13:49
Posts: 603
Location: Stroud
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:
Your manager and team did you proud today!

Looking forward to two Glos teams in L2 again next season, battling to see who finishes higher.

Thank you.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 19:31 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 13:26
Posts: 11819
Location: The Death Star.
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 0 time
Shade wrote:
asl wrote:
Shade wrote:
Refs fault for being a pleb.


Woah, woah, woah...I'm not having that. I thought that was one of the better refereeing performances I've seen at this level. In the first 5 mins, he could (and maybe should) have booked one from each team. He didn't, and seem to get more control as a result. He absolutely rightly booked Mo for being an embarrassment (I counted at least four acts of 'simulation' - with one genuine foul in the middle that, had he not been trying to con the ref beforehand, he may well have got.) I think the ref had a good game.


That's got absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying. Is it so hard for you guys to understand I'm having a go at him for not dealing with the timewasting?
Spot on...referees must do more to stop time wasting.

Sent from my Lenovo TB2-X30F using Tapatalk


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 19:48 
Offline

Joined: 03 Dec 2009, 10:22
Posts: 968
Location: Cotswolds
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Thought he was weak and very poor. Time wasting we see every game, especially if the opposition score first. It is up to the ref to be more proactive in this regard. Further we also ought to provide ball-boys to ensure speedy ball return to play - which we haven't for numerous games now - professionally v poor.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Congrats Old Tom Cat
 Post Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 19:55 
Offline

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:29
Posts: 2907
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Have to agree with Shade - the ref had a good game today aside from cracking down on the time-wasting.

I don't for a second blame FGR for doing it - but refs need to clamp down on it - today's ref didn't even attempt to and, whilst we could still be playing now and not look like scoring, it would have at least meant the shite game would have been over quicker.


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 14 posts ] 




Board index » THE NEST » CTFC CHAT ONLY


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 13 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: