Sell on clause
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
Reading in here all about the possibility of Mo Eisa transfer deal to who ever it may be for 1.5million, supporters are saying a selling on clause should also be in the transfer deal, which i feel is fair enough. My main reason for this posting is Does anyone know if there is a sell on clause between us and Greenwich Borough, it may of been mentioned and i have missed it
Been reading about Greenwich and they are owned by a very very rich chairman, not sure if it was his club when Mo was there, but if he was there I cant imagine such a business man would miss out ?
Greenwich are favourites to win there league
They have signed Gary Alexander whose dropped 5 Divisions
There is a propsed move to a new £50million stadium
Greenwich are favourites to win there league
They have signed Gary Alexander whose dropped 5 Divisions
There is a propsed move to a new £50million stadium
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: 27 Nov 2009, 22:46
the southern Salford?shevates wrote:Been reading about Greenwich and they are owned by a very very rich chairman, not sure if it was his club when Mo was there, but if he was there I cant imagine such a business man would miss out ?
Greenwich are favourites to win there league
They have signed Gary Alexander whose dropped 5 Divisions
There is a propsed move to a new £50million stadium
I was always under the impression that Mo was a freebie that Greenwich let go so that he could have a crack at the league, hence the short initial contract.
Who knows (other than those on the board, of course!), I suppose he might have been free but with an agreement in place that they get a % if it went well for him/he commanded a decent transfer fee in the future.
Who knows (other than those on the board, of course!), I suppose he might have been free but with an agreement in place that they get a % if it went well for him/he commanded a decent transfer fee in the future.
-
- Posts: 927
- Joined: 27 Nov 2009, 22:46
id be surprised if there wasnt a gentlemans agreement/goodwill gesture in place so Greenwich dont miss out.Shade wrote:I was always under the impression that Mo was a freebie that Greenwich let go so that he could have a crack at the league, hence the short initial contract.
Who knows (other than those on the board, of course!), I suppose he might have been free but with an agreement in place that they get a % if it went well for him/he commanded a decent transfer fee in the future.