More on Mo.

Talk about anything to do with Cheltenham Town, CTFC 500 Club, League 1, ex players & Managers

Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin

Alf
Posts: 2166
Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 08:24
Was Mo injured yesterday or was he just excluded from the squad? If it’s the latter then perhaps a loan deal maybe a good shout. He’d look good up front with Barnett.
Robin
Posts: 15946
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:19
Mo is injured but like I said yesterday if we had him and Barnett up top I feel we would get play offs minimum.
Alf
Posts: 2166
Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 08:24
Agree Robin. Failing that, maybe Duku could be trained for that position.
Robin
Posts: 15946
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:19
I feel we need to recognise Duku has stepped up a lot of levels and should be nurtured into the team. I'm sure he's disappointed not to be starting but like we did with Jombati easing him in may see better reward long term.
Andy
Posts: 349
Joined: 17 Aug 2017, 11:15
Robin wrote:Mo is injured but like I said yesterday if we had him and Barnett up top I feel we would get play offs minimum.
I doubt we would have signed Barnett if Mo was still here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Robin
Posts: 15946
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:19
I think we would have because we were looking for a target man with him here or not to be fair to replace Wright and Graham.
CTFC03
Posts: 1451
Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 20:32
Barnett is also proven.
horlickfanclub
Posts: 3905
Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 11:02
Graham would not have been paid off without the Eisa money Robin. Chickens and eggs were at work. Johnson failed to replace Wright and eventually Graham with an experienced target man.
Robin
Posts: 15946
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 11:19
Did we pay Graham off or let him move without a fee?
Post Reply