Page 1 of 1

More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 11:13
by Alf
Was Mo injured yesterday or was he just excluded from the squad? If it’s the latter then perhaps a loan deal maybe a good shout. He’d look good up front with Barnett.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 11:28
by Robin
Mo is injured but like I said yesterday if we had him and Barnett up top I feel we would get play offs minimum.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 11:51
by Alf
Agree Robin. Failing that, maybe Duku could be trained for that position.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 12:37
by Robin
I feel we need to recognise Duku has stepped up a lot of levels and should be nurtured into the team. I'm sure he's disappointed not to be starting but like we did with Jombati easing him in may see better reward long term.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 13:14
by Andy
Robin wrote:Mo is injured but like I said yesterday if we had him and Barnett up top I feel we would get play offs minimum.
I doubt we would have signed Barnett if Mo was still here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 13:43
by Robin
I think we would have because we were looking for a target man with him here or not to be fair to replace Wright and Graham.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 15:02
by CTFC03
Barnett is also proven.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 17 Sep 2018, 09:27
by horlickfanclub
Graham would not have been paid off without the Eisa money Robin. Chickens and eggs were at work. Johnson failed to replace Wright and eventually Graham with an experienced target man.

Re: More on Mo.

Posted: 17 Sep 2018, 17:46
by Robin
Did we pay Graham off or let him move without a fee?