Page 1 of 1

Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 15:17
by itsallbollox
Grimsby player has covid

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 15:38
by Ben3
Sounds a bit fishy to me

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 15:44
by Hubert Parry
Wish the player a full recovery.

A worrying trend is beginning to emerge here.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 15:47
by Malabus
What a load of s#!t. Suspend the season and get my money back. I've had enough now. Orient will be off too.

Feck the lot of it.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 15:54
by itsallbollox
Malabus wrote:What a load of s#!t. Suspend the season and get my money back. I've had enough now. Orient will be off too.

Feck the lot of it.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk
Got the same feeling ffs

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 15:58
by Horteng
FFS. How many games will end up like this

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 16:15
by Shade
I strongly echo the FFS.

But what can we do? Ending the season is going to do absolutely bugger all except bring even less income to clubs.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 16:28
by Robin
As I said on the other thread two postponements within a few days and cases rising across the country, this is going to become a more regular occurrence unless something can be done. Only way out of this is regular testing for all players and that needs funding.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 16:45
by tunnelvision
Doesn't bode well for the season. How long until the fixture pile-up becomes untenable, or is it now just a case of playing as many games as possible, to get some revenue, before the whole season is abandoned? If we need to rely upon the players (of all clubs) to keep socially distanced, then I think we're screwed!

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 16:48
by Malabus
tunnelvision wrote:Doesn't bode well for the season. How long until the fixture pile-up becomes untenable, or is it now just a case of playing as many games as possible, to get some revenue, before the whole season is abandoned? If we need to rely upon the players (of all clubs) to keep socially distanced, then I think we're screwed!
Yep, screwed, I agree.

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 16:52
by Malabus
Interesting to see if their game will be postponed.

https://twitter.com/StevenageFC/status/ ... 99042?s=19" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sent from my SM-T510 using Tapatalk

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 16:55
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Better that this is called off rather than Cod testing positive after the game which would have risked our players having to self isolate.

I can see some clubs - Peterborough the most likely candidate - to keep positive tests secret and play infected players in games without telling anyone.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 17:36
by ctfc-fan
It wouldn’t be so bad if the players didn’t hug each other all the time. Appreciate the elation of scoring but I wouldn’t walk upto one of my workmates and hug them. It’s almost like footballers are a different class to the rest of us....

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 19:50
by theidlerich
Minimal contact amongst players essential. Testing should be routine. Problem is at Governmental level, total incompetence and ineptitude unfortunately. Their philosophy is to avoid using The Public Sector’ which would have been markedly more efficient and successful.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 25 Sep 2020, 21:53
by tunnelvision
I also don't see why the Prem & EFL have different rules. West Ham have two players and the manager testing positive yet their game goes ahead. Why?

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 06:38
by Horteng
tunnelvision wrote:I also don't see why the Prem & EFL have different rules. West Ham have two players and the manager testing positive yet their game goes ahead. Why?
Thats a good point actually. If everyone else tested negative why not just remove said infected player and get on with it?

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 07:43
by Nesty
Horteng wrote:
tunnelvision wrote:I also don't see why the Prem & EFL have different rules. West Ham have two players and the manager testing positive yet their game goes ahead. Why?
Thats a good point actually. If everyone else tested negative why not just remove said infected player and get on with it?
I guess to do with incubation period ? but yes lets have some consistency !

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 07:44
by ctfc-fan
Horteng wrote:
tunnelvision wrote:I also don't see why the Prem & EFL have different rules. West Ham have two players and the manager testing positive yet their game goes ahead. Why?
Thats a good point actually. If everyone else tested negative why not just remove said infected player and get on with it?
With an incubation period around 5 days, testing doesn’t work like Kier Starmer suggests. It’s much better to isolate everyone.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 07:45
by Nesty
theidlerich wrote:Minimal contact amongst players essential. Testing should be routine. Problem is at Governmental level, total incompetence and ineptitude unfortunately. Their philosophy is to avoid using The Public Sector’ which would have been markedly more efficient and successful.
incompetence rules UK

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 08:39
by SHANDY VOR
RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:I can see some clubs - Peterborough the most likely candidate - to keep positive tests secret and play infected players in games without telling anyone.
That's quite a bold statement, on what do you base it?

Any skullduggery like this would be more enticive if for example Cheltenham were to draw Man Utd in the third round of the Cup with TV money at stake. Teams with a Covid have to hand the tie to their opponents - no postponements, no game, no money.

When cases are high I can see it becoming a later and later call, as Covid teams hang on to to see if their opponents make the same announcement before them.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 08:57
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
SHANDY VOR wrote:
RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:I can see some clubs - Peterborough the most likely candidate - to keep positive tests secret and play infected players in games without telling anyone.
That's quite a bold statement, on what do you base it?

Any skullduggery like this would be more enticive if for example Cheltenham were to draw Man Utd in the third round of the Cup with TV money at stake. Teams with a Covid have to hand the tie to their opponents - no postponements, no game, no money.

When cases are high I can see it becoming a later and later call, as Covid teams hang on to to see if their opponents make the same announcement before them.
The corporate culture at Cheltenham would not endorse that or allow it happen. Our Chairman and Board do things the right way.

The reverse is true for Peterborough, based on the vile persona projected by Darragh MadAnthony. Half his Twitter feed is pro-Trump stuff from Florida, so one doubts he has any qualms about lying and cover up for self-interest.

To compare the likes of Peterborough United to Cheltenham Town is an insult to Cheltenham Town.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 09:59
by horlickfanclub
Not keen on Peterborough but their money is helping us stay afloat.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 12:45
by Malabus
Why is Bradford v Stevenage still going ahead?

Image

Sent from my F104Bv2_PRO using Tapatalk

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 13:30
by asl
Maybe outside of the first team group ?

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 13:42
by Malabus
asl wrote:Maybe outside of the first team group ?
Squad is a squad.
Squad trained together.

Sent from my F104Bv2_PRO using Tapatalk

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 13:44
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Aren’t you out with your nutjob conspiracy mates in London to watch David Icke, Mal?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ovid-rules" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 13:47
by Horteng
Malabus wrote:Why is Bradford v Stevenage still going ahead?

Image

Sent from my F104Bv2_PRO using Tapatalk
It’s a joke

Don’t think Grimsby fancied it and it’s an excuse to postpone

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 15:07
by Alf
They’ll be doing Covid tests with VAR next.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 16:03
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Malabus wrote:Why is Bradford v Stevenage still going ahead?

Image

Sent from my F104Bv2_PRO using Tapatalk
The Covids lost at least.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 16:54
by SHANDY VOR
Alf wrote:They’ll be doing Covid tests with VAR next.
:)

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 16:55
by SHANDY VOR
RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:
SHANDY VOR wrote:
RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:I can see some clubs - Peterborough the most likely candidate - to keep positive tests secret and play infected players in games without telling anyone.
That's quite a bold statement, on what do you base it?

Any skullduggery like this would be more enticive if for example Cheltenham were to draw Man Utd in the third round of the Cup with TV money at stake. Teams with a Covid have to hand the tie to their opponents - no postponements, no game, no money.

When cases are high I can see it becoming a later and later call, as Covid teams hang on to to see if their opponents make the same announcement before them.

The corporate culture at Cheltenham would not endorse that or allow it happen. Our Chairman and Board do things the right way.

The reverse is true for Peterborough, based on the vile persona projected by Darragh MadAnthony. Half his Twitter feed is pro-Trump stuff from Florida, so one doubts he has any qualms about lying and cover up for self-interest.

To compare the likes of Peterborough United to Cheltenham Town is an insult to Cheltenham Town.
I'm not comparing the two clubs m'laddo.

Re: Grimsby match off

Posted: 26 Sep 2020, 18:12
by longmover
peterborough are the original gutter club