Coventry City latest
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
-
- Posts: 29814
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
And actually seeing it as well.Malabus wrote:Bet they are seeing at least150k minimum for renting their ground out.
so that all leaves the Ricoh being a bit of a white elephant?
This could all be a lot of posturing to get whatever needs to be done for them to carry on at Ricoh done
Like the Walsall mgrs comment that he wouldn't them there as it would ruin the pitch (heard that before)
This could all be a lot of posturing to get whatever needs to be done for them to carry on at Ricoh done
Like the Walsall mgrs comment that he wouldn't them there as it would ruin the pitch (heard that before)
- Dave Beesley
- Posts: 249
- Joined: 22 Dec 2009, 12:36
What I don't get is, they have been offered the Ricoh for free. So are they just being stubborn?
-
- Posts: 195
- Joined: 22 Nov 2009, 22:05
They've only been offered the Ricoh free for one season. I'm not sure what the proposal is beyond that - do they have to take the Ricoh for additional seasons at a prescribed rent, for example? It could be brinkmanship by the Sky Blues. Its all a bloody mess.Comedy Dave wrote:What I don't get is, they have been offered the Ricoh for free. So are they just being stubborn?
-
- Posts: 29814
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Owners of the Ricoh threaten to sue Northampton Town FC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23290546" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23290546" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Seems a messy situation.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Owners of the Ricoh threaten to sue Northampton Town FC.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23290546" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 29814
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
why would they go and watch NTFC games?Ralph wrote:the CC fans are saying they wont go to NTFC games as well..
-
- Posts: 29814
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Oh, you should have said!Ralph wrote:CCFC games at NTFC...
(FYI: I guessed that is what you meant though not what you wrote )