Page 1 of 1

NL Final

Posted: 06 May 2018, 16:38
by little mo
Tranmere v Boreham Wood, who do we want to come up?

Re: NL Final

Posted: 06 May 2018, 18:18
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Tranmere, as we have more chance of attracting Garrard in the Wood don’t make it. Though I suspect he will be in demand.

Re: NL Final

Posted: 12 May 2018, 05:53
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Not often you see non-league footy making the Jewish News:

http://jewishnews.timesofisrael.com/wem ... wonderful/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: NL Final

Posted: 12 May 2018, 10:36
by Ralph
Tranmere as I still haven't forgotten the brick throwing at BW in the Cup

Re: NL Final

Posted: 12 May 2018, 14:32
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Tranmere down to ten men inside a minute! But one nil up after six!

Eleven vs Ten evens it up for the Wood but surely Tranmere will still be too strong.

Re: NL Final

Posted: 12 May 2018, 15:16
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
1-1! 45 mins for Garrard to bring about one of the shock non-League results of all time.

With Borehamwood’s ground just 6.5 miles from Barnet’s Hive, will we see Akinde and any other Bees who crave League over Park making the switch if the Wood complete the miracle?

Re: NL Final

Posted: 12 May 2018, 15:58
by Ralph
bad mistake by BW keeper for the 2nd Tranmere goal

Re: NL Final

Posted: 12 May 2018, 16:09
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Job done by the Wirralmen. Whole game with ten men and never looked like losing. Showing the difference between football league history and pub football.

Do we gamble and try and poach Garrard now, or risk a rival doing so?

Re: NL Final

Posted: 14 May 2018, 12:31
by Shade
What a dick Ridehaugh was though. Making that tackle less than a minute in.

Re: NL Final

Posted: 14 May 2018, 13:14
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Shade wrote:What a dick Ridehaugh was though. Making that tackle less than a minute in.
Yup. Stupid. Still, maybe it was that which rattled the Woodmen and led to them being so subdued.

Re: NL Final

Posted: 14 May 2018, 15:52
by Shade
Probably did put more pressure on them whilst geeing Tranmere up more.

Re: NL Final

Posted: 14 May 2018, 18:29
by longmover
RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Job done by the Wirralmen. Whole game with ten men and never looked like losing. Showing the difference between football league history and pub football.

Do we gamble and try and poach Garrard now, or risk a rival doing so?
i know they are PT but I would question a manager that cant organise a side to beat a team down to ten men, no subs left on the pitch the size of Wembley. He didn't do anything to change the game at that stage, just looked very lost.

Re: NL Final

Posted: 14 May 2018, 21:16
by RegencyCheltenhamSpa
Players froze.

Plus, the Wembley pitch worked in Tranmere’s favour. Even with ten men, when it is Pro vs Park the part-timers will always struggle.