https://www.borehamwoodfootballclub.co. ... -this-one/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Well worth a read and i hope BW win this. Shows what clubs go through
Statement from Boreham Wood re player and his 25yr bad agent
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
-
- Posts: 29824
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Am I right in interpreting the release clause says that they have to let the player speak to AFC Wimbledon given they have met the £35k requirement?
Yeah I was reading through yesterday and they say they've done nothing wrong despite saying several times that the clause is £35k and a 20% sell on. They then say Wimbledon have offered £35k and a 25% sell on but turned it down because it's not as good as the Tranmere offer. Well, sorry, but you can't do that. I can understand them wanting to dig their heels in because some jumped up little s#!t has gone about it all wrong but to release a statement saying we haven't done anything wrong when clearly stating they're not honouring the contract is a bit daft.
-
- Posts: 29824
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Jumped up part-time wannabe wide-boys. If you don’t wanna sell for £35k, don’t sign a legally binding contract stating you will sell for £35k.Shade wrote:Yeah I was reading through yesterday and they say they've done nothing wrong despite saying several times that the clause is £35k and a 20% sell on. They then say Wimbledon have offered £35k and a 25% sell on but turned it down because it's not as good as the Tranmere offer. Well, sorry, but you can't do that. I can understand them wanting to dig their heels in because some jumped up little s#!t has gone about it all wrong but to release a statement saying we haven't done anything wrong when clearly stating they're not honouring the contract is a bit daft.
BW or/and the agent?RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Jumped up part-time wannabe wide-boys.Shade wrote:Yeah I was reading through yesterday and they say they've done nothing wrong despite saying several times that the clause is £35k and a 20% sell on. They then say Wimbledon have offered £35k and a 25% sell on but turned it down because it's not as good as the Tranmere offer. Well, sorry, but you can't do that. I can understand them wanting to dig their heels in because some jumped up little s#!t has gone about it all wrong but to release a statement saying we haven't done anything wrong when clearly stating they're not honouring the contract is a bit daft.
-
- Posts: 29824
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
BW. I would be much more rude about the agent.Shade wrote:BW or/and the agent?RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Jumped up part-time wannabe wide-boys.Shade wrote:Yeah I was reading through yesterday and they say they've done nothing wrong despite saying several times that the clause is £35k and a 20% sell on. They then say Wimbledon have offered £35k and a 25% sell on but turned it down because it's not as good as the Tranmere offer. Well, sorry, but you can't do that. I can understand them wanting to dig their heels in because some jumped up little s#!t has gone about it all wrong but to release a statement saying we haven't done anything wrong when clearly stating they're not honouring the contract is a bit daft.
-
- Posts: 29824
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Naive in the whole saga it sounds like.paperboy wrote:... weren't they a little naive paying good money for a player but only giving him a sixteen month contract.
Life is a big game so you gotta play with it with the big boys. And they failed.
....Ferrier apologies..
https://www.thenonleaguefootballpaper.c ... sfer-saga/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://www.thenonleaguefootballpaper.c ... sfer-saga/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Not sure if it’s my phone or the link but I get taken to affiliate future . Co . UK And not a news article.paperboy wrote:....Ferrier apologies..
https://www.thenonleaguefootballpaper.c ... sfer-saga/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk