Gone according to his Twitter page.
https://twitter.com/JCranstxn93" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Cranston
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
-
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: 27 Dec 2015, 14:19
- Location: Stroud
This account's Tweets are protected.
Only confirmed followers have access to @JCranstxn93's Tweets and complete profile. Click the "Follow" button to send a follow request.
Only confirmed followers have access to @JCranstxn93's Tweets and complete profile. Click the "Follow" button to send a follow request.
-
- Posts: 5057
- Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 20:19
More info here: http://bit.ly/LeftBackReleased" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 29813
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Thanks for the effort Jordan and well done for fronting up and keeping going in the face of the embarrassing boo-boys.
All the best.
Right, first one gone. We move on and seek a replacement. Illias?
All the best.
Right, first one gone. We move on and seek a replacement. Illias?
There you go again RCS attaching your labels. I take it by boo boys you mean those that had a different opinion to you and saw obvious flaws in his game and did not think we was of good enough standard for us to be serious in L2. If so, it seems another now holds that view as well
-
- Posts: 29813
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Nope. No. Not at all. Simply just referring to those who abused him at games week in week out.Ihearye wrote:There you go again RCS attaching your labels. I take it by boo boys you mean those that had a different opinion to you and saw obvious flaws in his game and did not think we was of good enough standard for us to be serious in L2. If so, it seems another now holds that view as well
Not talking about those who only talk about his weaknesses on here, or only his strengths, or both (like me). Purely talking about those who audibly boo and abuse during games (in what looks like a pre-meditated fashion) hence the label boo-boys. Regardless of what I or others think of a player, boo-boys help no one. Not the player, not the atmosphere, not anything. It could be a player I hate and think is useless but I will still criticise those who abuse all game even if I agree with you their opinion on the player.
(As an aside, the number one thing I think would improve the match day experience would be to clamp down on boo-boys and abuse. Paying good money to watch a football game and support your team only to have it ruined by some nutter shouting abuse at a player all game is not going to make someone want to come back again.)
Agree!RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Nope. No. Not at all. Simply just referring to those who abused him at games week in week out.Ihearye wrote:There you go again RCS attaching your labels. I take it by boo boys you mean those that had a different opinion to you and saw obvious flaws in his game and did not think we was of good enough standard for us to be serious in L2. If so, it seems another now holds that view as well
Not talking about those who only talk about his weaknesses on here, or only his strengths, or both (like me). Purely talking about those who audibly boo and abuse during games (in what looks like a pre-meditated fashion) hence the label boo-boys. Regardless of what I or others think of a player, boo-boys help no one. Not the player, not the atmosphere, not anything. It could be a player I hate and think is useless but I will still criticise those who abuse all game even if I agree with you their opinion on the player.
(As an aside, the number one thing I think would improve the match day experience would be to clamp down on boo-boys and abuse. Paying good money to watch a football game and support your team only to have it ruined by some nutter shouting abuse at a player all game is not going to make someone want to come back again.)
- Lord Elpuz
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 20 Jul 2011, 19:35
Booing does, on the face of it, appear to be a completely irrational outpouring of anger, disappointment, grief or loss, with a somewhat misguided expectation that the very action will change an outcome in that moment, for the better. It won’t.
An analogous situation from another sport may illustrate the futility of the action - e.g. horse racing:
Punters invest their hard-earned cash on a commodity that is, to put it quite simply, a game of chance. If said commodity (in this scenario a horse with a jockey on its back) is failing to deliver, would the act of the punter booing affect the outcome of the race, or even with the Bookies? No. You win some, you lose some. You take the rough with the smooth. But if all the losing punters were forever booing at the races, it would get quickly stamped on, because it completely spoils the enjoyment for other punters.
An analogous situation from another sport may illustrate the futility of the action - e.g. horse racing:
Punters invest their hard-earned cash on a commodity that is, to put it quite simply, a game of chance. If said commodity (in this scenario a horse with a jockey on its back) is failing to deliver, would the act of the punter booing affect the outcome of the race, or even with the Bookies? No. You win some, you lose some. You take the rough with the smooth. But if all the losing punters were forever booing at the races, it would get quickly stamped on, because it completely spoils the enjoyment for other punters.
-
- Posts: 3928
- Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 11:02
How many games have you attended when you have heards Jordan Cranston being booed Regency? It seems that finally the Manager has realised the limitations of Jordan Cranston.
I can honestly say having attended most home matches since he arrived, I can not recall one boo directed at JC, plenty of mutterings in the I2P and shaking of heads but that's about it. When he did well, he always got plenty of encouragement from the same people. That I think is fair enough
-
- Posts: 29813
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Almost every home game I attended last season and every away game. Cambridge away last season for example was the final straw for three of my friends who vowed never to go to a match again due to the vitriol from the CTFC ‘supporters’.horlickfanclub wrote:How many games have you attended when you have heards Jordan Cranston being booed Regency? It seems that finally the Manager has realised the limitations of Jordan Cranston.
I agree with the limitations and happy to see JC released. Criticising boo-boys is not the same as defending a player.
I dont have any further info other than that. I met both players where i work after they had trained and signed on Weds 25/04. (2weeks ago, not 1, my mistake)Robin wrote:Where has this come from as we are being linked with Chris Hussey according to the press. Assuming these two players are true can you give us a bit more detail i.e. where they are coming from or prior experience assuming you won't name them.
-
- Posts: 29813
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Dots on Is and crosses on Ts? Or it is bullshizzle - maybe he got a tip off from your source Robin!Robin wrote:But then why would the club not announce it if they had signed?
Don’t go to many away games, and have to agree with you on the ‘atmosphere’ created by a section of our away support. Spurs away and Hereford away more or less resigned me to home matches only. For the same reasoning as your 3 friends I guess. One goes to a game to be able to ‘relax’ and enjoy the experience, some do their best to prevent that and anyone in their eyes is a suitable target for abuseRegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Almost every home game I attended last season and every away game. Cambridge away last season for example was the final straw for three of my friends who vowed never to go to a match again due to the vitriol from the CTFC ‘supporters’.horlickfanclub wrote:How many games have you attended when you have heards Jordan Cranston being booed Regency? It seems that finally the Manager has realised the limitations of Jordan Cranston.
I agree with the limitations and happy to see JC released. Criticising boo-boys is not the same as defending a player.