Join us if you care about Britain.
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Excellent to see UKIP know the alphabet.Malabus wrote:
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Tell us again who you are voting for and why, Mal. Some pictures might help get the message across.
#dontdeportsido
#dontdeportsido
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
I would love it if you two bumped into each other at the ballot station? Will you both carry a stack posters to combat one another like two children using oversized Pokemon cards?
http://www.ukip.org/new_ukip_posters_re ... _of_living" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Taken until 2014 for people to realise the CAP is rubbish?
I would rather they said buy British rather than encouraging rain forest destruction but I guess Mal you have no concern for the environment or farmers in the UK. After all you are campaigning against wind farms and in support of supermarkets driving our dairy farmers out of business.
Think about it for a second. 1. if we have less immigration we lose cheap labour. 2. race to the bottom of food prices means imports are cheaper. 3. Higher domestic labour and cheaper imports means loads more UK farms out of business and we will rely more and more on foreign nations. Hardly an independent UK food supply!
Mal, I thought you had at least a GCSE level understanding of economics and policy?
I would rather they said buy British rather than encouraging rain forest destruction but I guess Mal you have no concern for the environment or farmers in the UK. After all you are campaigning against wind farms and in support of supermarkets driving our dairy farmers out of business.
Think about it for a second. 1. if we have less immigration we lose cheap labour. 2. race to the bottom of food prices means imports are cheaper. 3. Higher domestic labour and cheaper imports means loads more UK farms out of business and we will rely more and more on foreign nations. Hardly an independent UK food supply!
Mal, I thought you had at least a GCSE level understanding of economics and policy?
Excuse me.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Taken until 2014 for people to realise the CAP is rubbish?
I would rather they said buy British rather than encouraging rain forest destruction but I guess Mal you have no concern for the environment or farmers in the UK. After all you are campaigning against wind farms and in support of supermarkets driving our dairy farmers out of business.
Think about it for a second. 1. if we have less immigration we lose cheap labour. 2. race to the bottom of food prices means imports are cheaper. 3. Higher domestic labour and cheaper imports means loads more UK farms out of business and we will rely more and more on foreign nations. Hardly an independent UK food supply!
Mal, I thought you had at least a GCSE level understanding of economics and policy?
1. Immigration = low wages and more profits for these big evil bosses Joey is constantly informing us about.
2. It's never cheap to import (ask the Icelandic).
3. This is when you lost the plot RCS.
Don't need a degree in economics.
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
1. Correct. So if we don't have immigration we won't gave low wages and farmers will struggle. See this for reference:
http://www.fwi.co.uk/articles/08/03/201 ... scheme.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Supermarkets will buy abroad rather than support higher wages on UK farms. If you want to end immigration you need to end our reliance on cheap labour.
2. So you are actually saying that your own UKIP poster and link about cheap imports is wrong? Why then use it as an argument?
http://www.fwi.co.uk/articles/08/03/201 ... scheme.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Supermarkets will buy abroad rather than support higher wages on UK farms. If you want to end immigration you need to end our reliance on cheap labour.
2. So you are actually saying that your own UKIP poster and link about cheap imports is wrong? Why then use it as an argument?
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Completely - has no idea about his own views and no knowledge at all of UKIPs policies or how they relate to each other and reality.Joey wrote:I can't even be bothered with Mal anymore, he's a walking contradiction.
Very much supporting UKIP over one issue - EU - despite the fact so many of the policies seem to be the opposite of Mal's views.
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Stand for three things:Malabus wrote:The trouble is that RCS or Joey have no idea what UKIP stands for. This is where the problem clearly lies.
1. anti-EU (legislation whether good or bad for UK, and immigration, etc.
2. Pro-business (so anti-employment rights and anti-environmental regulation)
3. Pro-elitism (so deliberate discrimination against women and anti-homosexuality)
-
RegencyCheltenhamSpa
- Posts: 29832
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
A sign of things to come?
Police have asked a blogger to remove a tweet that fact-checked Ukip policies but did not break any laws after receiving a complaint from a Ukip councillor, prompting concern over attempts to stifle debate.
A Cambridgeshire police spokesman said: "A Ukip councillor came across a tweet which he took exception to. The name of the person on the tweet was identified and that individual was spoken to. We looked at this for offences and there was nothing we could actually identify that required police intervention. Clearly, the councillor was unhappy about the tweets. If every political person was unhappy about what somebody else said about their views, we would have no politics."
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... CMP=twt_gu" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Police have asked a blogger to remove a tweet that fact-checked Ukip policies but did not break any laws after receiving a complaint from a Ukip councillor, prompting concern over attempts to stifle debate.
A Cambridgeshire police spokesman said: "A Ukip councillor came across a tweet which he took exception to. The name of the person on the tweet was identified and that individual was spoken to. We looked at this for offences and there was nothing we could actually identify that required police intervention. Clearly, the councillor was unhappy about the tweets. If every political person was unhappy about what somebody else said about their views, we would have no politics."
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... CMP=twt_gu" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Your vicious comments suggests that you have no care for your people or country. You are the enemy of Britannia and need to be punished. Society needs re-shaping ASAP.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Good job I am not a commie then.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/201 ... te-croydon" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://news.opinium.co.uk/survey-result ... ng-9th-may" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://news.opinium.co.uk/survey-result ... ng-9th-may" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27399841" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... money.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... guage.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
What wrong with that?...I give the finger all the time to motorists that think they own the road. I bet you have given the finger to someone lately or in the past. I applaud her, why do people go all Girly when UKIP slightly stray off-line.
Vote UKIP 22nd May the party that are not afraid to talk about the real issues that are problematic in this decaying country.
Vote UKIP 22nd May the party that are not afraid to talk about the real issues that are problematic in this decaying country.