Two players leave
Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
-
- Posts: 5069
- Joined: 13 Feb 2010, 20:19
http://bit.ly/PairLeave" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 2666
- Joined: 04 Oct 2012, 07:16
Jaysus would it not just have been a lot easier to be helpful and give the name. Awkward for the sake of itandgarod wrote:Theres a couple of clues
One is goalkeeper, the other is in the link or check the OS and if it isnt up to date then click the link
Are you fishing or just out of touch
no, cos he's just being RCS...confused.com wrote:Jaysus would it not just have been a lot easier to be helpful and give the name. Awkward for the sake of itandgarod wrote:Theres a couple of clues
One is goalkeeper, the other is in the link or check the OS and if it isnt up to date then click the link
Are you fishing or just out of touch
-
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: 06 Dec 2009, 15:48
I hope this is right.Robin wrote:Dillon is coming guys (at least I hope so), Flatt for me was nowhere near the same level (although he did a solid job for us).
I see JP had tweeted he could possibly play tomorrow night
-
- Posts: 451
- Joined: 24 Nov 2009, 12:34
Thought Rose was OK, although at fault for goal against Barnsley. If we're letting him go, then can only hope that Dillon is returning.Robin wrote:Dillon is coming guys (at least I hope so), Flatt for me was nowhere near the same level (although he did a solid job for us).
I wasn't impressed by Flatt!
Personally, I thought Flatty was as good as Dillon - a rock in the run-in. I'd be happy with either - I'd be even happier with our own permanent #1, but I appreciate that GJ wants the use the loan system to get his #1 keeper, and have the second keeper as our player, simply because you won't get a parent club to loan a keeper for them to be on the bench - or at least not one that's likely to be good enough.
Flatty did incredible to come right into the team when the pressure was on and get the job done. I think he was right up there with Dillon. Hey we could have got the WBA keeper and been totally screwedLondon Exile wrote:I hope this is right.Robin wrote:Dillon is coming guys (at least I hope so), Flatt for me was nowhere near the same level (although he did a solid job for us).
I see JP had tweeted he could possibly play tomorrow night
-
- Posts: 29846
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
You advised Ben2 and others who 'whined' not to click the links if they didn't want to encounter adverts.Ralph wrote:click the link and you'll find outRegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote:Which two players?
I was advised that threads started with a link would not impede sebsible debate.
So I did not click the link and asked a sensible question to discuss the issue, only for criticism and farce to ensue.
Which two players? I saw about Dale in the other thread.
-
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: 06 Dec 2009, 15:48
Jack Rose and Andreas Komodikis are the two players leaving after trial spells.
^^ ThisRalph wrote:Flatty did incredible to come right into the team when the pressure was on and get the job done. I think he was right up there with Dillon. Hey we could have got the WBA keeper and been totally screwedLondon Exile wrote:I hope this is right.Robin wrote:Dillon is coming guys (at least I hope so), Flatt for me was nowhere near the same level (although he did a solid job for us).
I see JP had tweeted he could possibly play tomorrow night
He had some big boots to fill both on and off the pitch and he did it with ease
Gary did seem to think he will be the No 2 at Wolves this season however so whether he'd be available remains a doubt
-
- Posts: 29846
- Joined: 21 Nov 2009, 03:27
Cheers. Probably for the best.London Exile wrote:Jack Rose and Andreas Komodikis are the two players leaving after trial spells.
Agree with the comments re: Flatt. He featured in a couple of our TV games and the commentators rated him.
-
- Posts: 3953
- Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 11:02
Flatt was on a par with Dillon. Because the team played as a unit neither keeper was ever under siege so maybe we need to see how this season pans out for them.