Register    Login    Search    FAQ



CTFC.com Official Site Cheltenham Town FC 500 Club

Other Useful Links:     Leo's Blog    Robins Trust    CTFC Chatter    Football Ground Guide    This is Gloucestershire    News Now    CTFC History Site

Board index » THE NEST » CTFC CHAT ONLY




 Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 



Author Message
 Post subject: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 12:13 
Offline

Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 09:24
Posts: 1526
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Was Mo injured yesterday or was he just excluded from the squad? If it’s the latter then perhaps a loan deal maybe a good shout. He’d look good up front with Barnett.


Top  Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 12:28 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:19
Posts: 12358
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Mo is injured but like I said yesterday if we had him and Barnett up top I feel we would get play offs minimum.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 12:51 
Offline

Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 09:24
Posts: 1526
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Agree Robin. Failing that, maybe Duku could be trained for that position.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 13:37 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:19
Posts: 12358
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
I feel we need to recognise Duku has stepped up a lot of levels and should be nurtured into the team. I'm sure he's disappointed not to be starting but like we did with Jombati easing him in may see better reward long term.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 14:14 
Offline

Joined: 17 Aug 2017, 12:15
Posts: 107
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Robin wrote:
Mo is injured but like I said yesterday if we had him and Barnett up top I feel we would get play offs minimum.


I doubt we would have signed Barnett if Mo was still here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 14:43 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:19
Posts: 12358
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
I think we would have because we were looking for a target man with him here or not to be fair to replace Wright and Graham.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 16 Sep 2018, 16:02 
Offline

Joined: 01 Jun 2013, 21:32
Posts: 1411
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Barnett is also proven.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 17 Sep 2018, 10:27 
Offline

Joined: 04 Aug 2011, 12:02
Posts: 2726
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Graham would not have been paid off without the Eisa money Robin. Chickens and eggs were at work. Johnson failed to replace Wright and eventually Graham with an experienced target man.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: More on Mo.
 Post Posted: 17 Sep 2018, 18:46 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 12:19
Posts: 12358
Has thanked: 0 time
Been thanked: 0 time
Did we pay Graham off or let him move without a fee?


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 9 posts ] 




Board index » THE NEST » CTFC CHAT ONLY


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Red Duke and 9 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: