Two things:Robin wrote:Now I think you are at the heart of the issue Artemis. One risk adverse shareholder in particular who is close to Bloxham didn't like how the club was being led.
How do you know it was one major shareholder? To carry any significant vote would require a majority. As far as I know, no one shareholder has in excess of 50% of the issued share capital.
You call them risk averse, they might call themselves prudent.....and its their money and risk to own, not yours, not the former chairman's. I've never understood why football supporters expect others to put their money at risk for supporter's entertainment or reflected glory.
Those two points aside, as a trust member, I am intrigued by the trust's position on this - as a major shareholder themselves.