I’ll start… National Service, yay or nay?
For me I think it’s a yes and hopefully kick some sense into some of the lazy feckers

Moderators: Admin, Ralph, asl, Robin
Lord Cameron get it right please.asl wrote: ↑27 May 2024, 14:46 Labour have made a seismic lurch back to the centre since Corbyn was ousted. The Tories are just heading more and more to the right in order to appease the racist intolerant elements of the population. Unfortunately for them, Reform are already mopping up the remnants of UKIP support so they'll end up making sure Labour get in.
Well done, David Cameron - this is all your feckin' fault, sucking up to UKIP.
Making it compulsory just leads to lots of people who have no interest or knowledge in the political situation putting a cross in a random box, or voting for someone "for a laugh", though. If they don't want to vote, that is their decision. I think, for example, Labour getting a huge majority with a very small turnout should still make them think they need to keep on their toes because there are a lot of people out there that didn't vote for them. Compare that to Labour getting in with a huge majority and a huge turnout, they'll think they're invincible for the next 12 years.asl wrote: ↑04 Jul 2024, 08:42 Make sure you vote, today. If you genuinely believe all politicians are the same and you don't want to vote - attend and spoil your ballot with "None of the above". Believe it or not, these are all counted, too.
Whoever you vote for - get out there and vote! Personally, I'd make it compulsory...
And even less wanted to stay on
The people who never accepted a 52% win on a 72% turnout are the same people who have accepted they have won even though they got 33% on a 59% turnout.asl wrote:40% of the British public didn't even vote so they have no right to any opinions, hereafter.
I'm surprised at you, though, Mal: using turnout figures in that way is like admitting that only 25% of the British people voted to leave the EU...
FPP has been favoured by the Tories as it has enabled them more often than not to stay in power. There was a referendum on Proportional Representation but they didn't support it.Malabus wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 23:47The people who never accepted a 52% win on a 72% turnout are the same people who have accepted they have won even though they got 33% on a 59% turnout.asl wrote:40% of the British public didn't even vote so they have no right to any opinions, hereafter.
I'm surprised at you, though, Mal: using turnout figures in that way is like admitting that only 25% of the British people voted to leave the EU...
Referendum was on AV, not PR. It would still have elected constituency MPs as currently, but if no candidate got 50% in the first round of counting the lowest would be discounted and their second preferences added it up - like you point out they do in France.Red Duke wrote: ↑07 Jul 2024, 16:05FPP has been favoured by the Tories as it has enabled them more often than not to stay in power. There was a referendum on Proportional Representation but they didn't support it.Malabus wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 23:47The people who never accepted a 52% win on a 72% turnout are the same people who have accepted they have won even though they got 33% on a 59% turnout.asl wrote:40% of the British public didn't even vote so they have no right to any opinions, hereafter.
I'm surprised at you, though, Mal: using turnout figures in that way is like admitting that only 25% of the British people voted to leave the EU...
Did you vote in that, Mal? If you didn't you can't complaim.
Now the Tories have been on the receiving end of the unfairness of the system, they may change their tune.
Maybe we should go for a French style double voting system where the winner has to have more 50% of the vote in one area to become an MP.
Last I heard Elected Councillors didn’t actually go out and build stuff. Delays will primarily be From contractors, with some responsibility for the local authority procurement team.Ihearye wrote: ↑05 Jul 2024, 10:54 pertinent given the new Cheltenham MP was / is part of the council. The changes to Central Cross drive (minimal that they are), started on Jan 4th and are still not complete 6 months later. This is the standard of politician we are electing. How depressing.
The Empire State was built in 13 months. Just think in that time, our local politicians could have overseen closing off both ends of Central Cross drive![]()
I personally have never been in favour of PR as a replacement for FPTP.
I would go with STV as opposed to PR, as it keeps the link between the elected and the voter.RegencyCheltenhamSpa wrote: ↑08 Jul 2024, 21:18I personally have never been in favour of PR as a replacement for FPTP.
Problem with PR is that it is completely disconnected from the local electorate. A constituency might have a vote share of 1% for a particular party whilst nationally the party might have 20%. And conversely, they may have 40% share for a different party which nationally only has 5%. I think it would very unfair and undemocratic for that constituency to not have the representation they chose.
Having PR replace the House of Lords would be a good option. Perhaps like the EU elections where we had PR but at a regional level.